Part-time work, "There is a man at home"

Her husband traveled outside and part-time but insisted that "there is a man at home," which caused a husband and wife battle. Ms. Wang, a Wuxi citizen, sued the court in order to restore her reputation.
Ms. Wang had encountered a depressing thing that jumped to the Yellow River some time ago. On the eighth day of the eighth year, her husband came out on a tour, but Xu Axuan, who worked at home for two years to clean up, insisted that the man was at home. After her husband came home, he heard a rumor and he quarreled loudly with his wife. For self-certification, Ms. Wang Qing called a group of relatives and friends to face Xu Auntie.

“My husband went on a trip to Mingchu and Ming Dynasty. Why did you say he was at home?” Facing the questions of Ms. Wang and her husband, Xu aunt insisted that “At that time, there was a man in the house wearing cotton wool pants and going to the toilet and sleeping in the hostess bed. I did not see his face, of course, thought he was the man. "When faced with the quality not only did not return a innocence, Ms. Wang's relationship with her husband is getting worse. In order to restore the trust of her husband, Ms. Wang sued Xu Ah-yi in a paper complaint.

Ms. Wang stated that Xu Ah-fu made falsehoods and defamed herself, resulting in insomnia and physical discomfort, as well as a serious crack in her husband-wife relationship, which constituted reputational infringement. Xu Ao was ordered to apologize, eliminate influence, restore reputation, and compensate for 5,000 yuan in mental damages.

The Chong'an court hearing the case held that the citizen’s right of reputation is protected by law. Any person who insults or slanders others in written or oral form and publishes or publicizes the privacy of others without their consent, or who damages the reputation of others, should bear the responsibility. Responsibility for infringement of another person's right to reputation

The defendant, knowing that the plaintiff’s husband was not at home on the 8th of the eighth year of the year, told the relevant person that the man had no evidence to support the plaintiff's family and that it involved the privacy of others, resulting in the plaintiff’s spousal relationship. The defendant was at fault and should apologize to the plaintiff. He must eliminate the influence of the plaintiff and restore his reputation within the range of the counterparty. However, because the plaintiff did not provide evidence to prove that the defendant’s behavior caused him to suffer from insomnia and physical discomfort, he refused the plaintiff’s request for the defendant’s compensation for the 5,000 mental damage solatium payment in consideration of the defendant’s behavior.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Prev: Nanjing Gate 1 jump 18 times a day continued: Developers to raise funds to receive electricity